In the previous section, I raised a question about freedom of expression in Indonesia. The complexity faced by the idea makes it an ongoing process and quest. Subsequently, we cannot assert that Islam in Indonesia embodies this idea. The crash among preachers over a compatibility of freedom of expression and Islamic teaching remains the deepest problem. As a consequence, the expression, or even the confession of beliefs, by minority groups is often labelled as a heresy (penyimpangan).
In this case, Shiah and Ahmadiah groups will be able to be concrete illustration. For years those groups have sought ways to confess their religious belief and practices. However, Indonesian Muslims believe that Shiah and Ahmadiah are not only heretics but also insulting Islam. This is not special case showing a quest for freedom of expression. Similar case was faced by adherents of local beliefs (kepercayaan lokal).
Based on this reality, we can summarize that freedom of expression in Indonesian is an ongoing process. Though some scholars mentioned Islam in Indonesia as a smiling appearance, the expression by minority groups cannot be guaranteed. In conclusion, the activists of human rights and preachers who align with this issue must seek new methods. It is aimed to show and prove that Islam in Indonesia appears with their authentic face which smiles as mentioned.