In the fall of 2022, I had the opportunity to partake in a discourse organized by my classmates, during which I delivered a lecture for our Muslim Political Thought course. The focus of the lecture was the role of the madrassa within the Muslim society of the subcontinent, starting from the arrival of Islam there and exploring the ensuing frictions between Muslims and Non-Muslims in that region.
Subsequently, I was asked by several audience members about Geertz’s theory of Muslim Java. I endeavored to give a comprehensive explanation of Geertz’s trichotomies of Muslim Java, including some personal critiques. Herein, I will revisit my criticisms of Geertz’s trichotomies.
The title of this piece might prompt the question: why have I chosen to write about “Muslim Java” rather than “Javanese Religion,” as Geertz does in his book? There are two main reasons for this.
First, Java has been Islamized for centuries, specifically from the sixteenth century till the present day. Hence, in any discussion about the Javanese people, it is essential to note that they have adopted Islam at various levels: as a new identity, a new belief, or both.
One Reply to “Revisiting Geertz’s Muslim Java”