However, this effort was not based on a clear and objective approach. The author finds this approach problematic and argues that it contradicts the reality of interpretation and the necessary methods of ijtihad. The author contends that the notion of standardization is highly subjective, depending on personal preferences. A writer has the freedom to choose sources, extract rules, evaluate their foundations, and connect them to interpretations or interpreters.
The author concludes that the assumption that universal and inductive interpretive rules have been synthesized, constructed, and defined is an illogical conclusion.
—
Book Information:
Title: Al-Ta’lif Al-Mu’ashirah fi Qawa’id Al-Tafsir: Dirasat Al-Naqdiyyah li Manhajiyyat Al-Hukmi bi Al-Qaidiyyah.
Authors: Dr. M. Salih Muhammad Sulaiman, Khalil Mahmud Yamani, and Mahmud Hamad Sayyid
Publisher: Marka Tafsir li Dirasat Al-Quraniyyah Saudi, 2019.